A pale pink ranunculus opened to show its layered paper-thin petals

Prague: How a City Becomes a Bouquet

Kellie, co-founder of Fig & Bloom, in the studio

Kellie

Co-founder, Fig & Bloom

Kellie is the co-founder of Fig & Bloom and designs the range, bringing ten years in fashion to how the studio works with colour and form.

Every design in our range is named after a place. It sounds like branding. It is actually the rule that stops me overfilling a bouquet.

People assume the names come last. That we build a bouquet, look at it, and reach for something that sounds nice. Monaco. Lucerne. Marseille. It is the other way around. The place comes first, and then it sits over the whole design like a brief I am not allowed to argue with.

I learned this in fashion, not in flowers. Ten years inside Decjuba, Country Road Group and Witchery, and every range I ever worked on started with a narrow idea and then had to survive everybody's good suggestions. The ones that made it to the floor intact were the ones where the idea was specific enough to say no on your behalf. A vague brief gets added to. A precise one defends itself.

So the cities are not decoration. They are the thing doing the editing.

What a place actually gives you

A city is not a colour. It is a light, a temperature, a set of materials, and a mood. That is far more useful to a designer than a swatch.

Lucerne is white and silver, cold and clean, the light coming off frost. When I am building it, anything warm has to go. That is why it sits in the white flowers part of the range and why it never drifts toward cream. Osaka is cherry blossom season, so it has to stay pale, airy and slightly unresolved, the way blossom looks a day before it drops. Pyrenees is all white too, but it is texture instead of gloss, more rock than snow.

None of that is written down as a colour code. It does not need to be. If I am holding a warm apricot stem and the word in my head is Lucerne, I put it back.

Why Prague

Prague came out of a problem I had with romance.

The category default for romance in this country is a dozen red roses, and I have written before about what I actually think of the rose. The issue is not the flower. It is that the dozen red roses is a purchase, not a gesture. It says the right thing so efficiently that it stops meaning anything. You are buying a symbol off a shelf.

But the alternative most florists reach for is worse: they go soft. All blush, all prettiness, nothing at stake. That is not romance either. That is a nice thought.

Prague is a city that holds both. It is genuinely romantic in the old sense, dark stone and low light and a bit of drama, but there is nothing sugary about it. It is not a pretty city. It is a beautiful one, which is a different and better thing.

Pretty is what you land on when you have not decided anything. Beautiful requires a decision.

So the design goes deep crimson against blush pink, which is a harder pairing than it sounds. Put those two next to each other badly and you get Valentine's Day. Put them together with enough space and enough difference in texture and you get something closer to velvet.

The stems do the structural work. Snapdragon gives it height and a spire, so it never reads as a dome. Ranunculus brings the fine layers, dozens of paper-thin petals that catch light where the crimson swallows it. Lisianthus softens the joins. Protea is the piece most people would leave out, and it is the reason the whole thing has a spine, one flat sculptural face holding everything else in place. Magnolia foliage keeps it dark at the base rather than green and chirpy.

Take the protea out and it collapses into a nice pink bouquet. Take the crimson out and it is a pastel. Every one of those five is load-bearing.

Two builds of the Prague bouquet photographed in the studio against a dark background, pink protea and ranunculus wrapped in Fig and Bloom paper
Prague, built twice in the studio

The name is a constraint, not a story

Here is the part I actually care about. The naming is not there to make the bouquet sound well travelled. It is there to make the bouquet finishable.

The hardest thing in floristry, and in fashion, is knowing when to stop. There is always one more stem you could add, and it will always look like an improvement in the moment, because more looks like value and value feels safe. That instinct is how the category ended up where it is, with bunches that are large and expensive and say nothing.

A place gives you a way to stop. Not because it tells you what to put in, but because it tells you, instantly and without debate, what does not belong. Once you can say no quickly, you can edit. And an edited bouquet is a designed object rather than a gathering of nice things, which is the only distinction I really care about. I have written the uglier version of that argument in what makes a bouquet look cheap.

The Prague bouquet at a white arched doorway, and carried along a cobbled street in a grey coat
Prague, out in the city it is named for

It is also honest. When you send Prague, you are not sending a city. You are sending a set of decisions that somebody made on purpose, which is more than most flowers can claim.

Prague, a Fig and Bloom bouquet of crimson and blush blooms

Romance without the shortcut.

Crimson and blush, snapdragon, ranunculus, lisianthus and protea, from $129. Shop Prague →


If Prague is not the mood, the rest of the range is named the same way, and each one will tell you fairly quickly whether it is for you. Start with the romantic flowers, or take the whole thing in one go across the fresh bouquets.

Previous post Next post
Fig & Bloom studio archway, styled with fresh flowers

Get 20% more stems

Join our list and every order arrives with 20% more stems — on us. No points to collect, nothing to redeem. Just a fuller bunch, every time.

more stems, every order →